Some models are just aliases to other models. Make this relation
available to users via domain capabilities.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Record a fact a specific CPU model was derived from another one. The
original model is also marked as an alias of the new one in case it did
not change any properties of the original CPU.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
The signatures in the CPU map are used for matching physical CPUs and
thus we need to cover all possible real world variants we know about.
When adding a new version of an existing CPU model, we should copy the
signature(s) of the existing model rather than replacing it with the
signature that QEMU uses.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Add all newly generated CPU models to the appropriate section of
index.xml.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
We already visually group the included models using comments. This patch
introduces a new <group name='...'> element for doing it properly in a
machine friendly way.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
XMLs parse/format round trip using lxml results in an XML document that
almost exactly matches the original (including comments).
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
We don't really need or want the extra info to be included in the CPU
model definitions in git, it's mostly useful for verifying the output of
the script. Let's store it in a separate file rather than in a comment
block of the CPU model definition itself.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Each CPU model with -v* suffix is defined as a standalone model copying
all attributes of the previous version. CPU model versions with an alias
are handled differently. The full definition is used for the alias and
the versioned model is created as an identical copy of the alias.
To avoid breaking migration compatibility of host-model CPUs all
versioned models are marked with <decode guest='off'/> so that they are
ignored when selecting candidates for host-model. It's not ideal but not
doing so would break almost all host-model CPUs as the new versioned CPU
models have all vmx-* features included since their introduction while
existing CPU models were updated later. This meas existing models would
be accompanied with a long list of vmx-* features to properly describe a
host CPU while the newly added CPU models would have those features
enabled implicitly and their list of features would be significantly
shorter. Thus the new models would always be better candidates for
host-model than the existing models.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
While the script for synchronizing CPU features expects a path to QEMU
source tree, this CPU model script insisted on getting a full patch to
cpu.c file, even though it could easily deduce it from the path to QEMU
source tree.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
We don't change definitions of CPU models which were already included in
a libvirt release to maintain migration compatibility. Thus the script
can just skip existing models and save us from having to drop the
changes it would do to them.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
When removing features unknown to QEMU (they have a different name or
are completely missing as they are not configurable by a user) I should
not have removed them from the list of features unknown to QEMU in the
script for synchronizing QEMU features to the CPU map.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
When a CPU model is defined based on another model, we were completely
ignoring features marked as added to or removed from the original model
after it was released. For added features this is the right thing to do
as it will promote them to become normal features included in the new
model. But features marked as removed would become included in the new
model as well. We need to explicitly remove them as if they were never
included in the model.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Document which fields are inherited when a CPU model is based on another
model.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Currently translated at 95.7% (10074 of 10526 strings)
Translation: libvirt/libvirt
Translate-URL: https://translate.fedoraproject.org/projects/libvirt/libvirt/zh_CN/
Co-authored-by: jianqing yan <yanjianqing@kylinos.cn>
Signed-off-by: jianqing yan <yanjianqing@kylinos.cn>
Signed-off-by: Nikolai Barybin <nikolai.barybin@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
