Some AMD processors only support a non-architectural means of
enabling Speculative Store Bypass Disable. To allow simplified
handling in virtual environments, hypervisors will expose an
architectural definition through CPUID bit 0x80000008_EBX[25].
This needs to be exposed to guest OS running on AMD x86 hosts to
allow them to protect against CVE-2018-3639.
Note that since this CPUID bit won't be present in the host CPUID
results on physical hosts, it will not be enabled automatically
in guests configured with "host-model" CPU unless using QEMU
version >= 2.9.0. Thus for older versions of QEMU, this feature
must be manually enabled using policy=force. Guests using the
"host-passthrough" CPU mode do not need special handling.
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
New microcode introduces the "Speculative Store Bypass Disable"
CPUID feature bit. This needs to be exposed to guest OS to allow
them to protect against CVE-2018-3639.
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
We can start qemu with a "cpu,+la57" to set 57-bit vitrual address
space. So VM can be aware that it need to enable 5-level paging.
Corresponding QEMU commits:
al57 6c7c3c21f95dd9af8a0691c0dd29b07247984122
This is a variant of EPYC with indirect branch prediction protection.
The only difference between EPYC and EPYC-IBPB is the added "ibpb"
feature.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Hrdina <phrdina@redhat.com>
This is a variant of Skylake-Server with indirect branch prediction
protection. The only difference between Skylake-Server and
Skylake-Server-IBRS is the added "spec-ctrl" feature.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Hrdina <phrdina@redhat.com>
This is a variant of Skylake-Client with indirect branch prediction
protection. The only difference between Skylake-Client and
Skylake-Client-IBRS is the added "spec-ctrl" feature.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Hrdina <phrdina@redhat.com>
This is a variant of Broadwell with indirect branch prediction
protection. The only difference between Broadwell and Broadwell-IBRS is
the added "spec-ctrl" feature.
The Broadwell-IBRS model in QEMU is a bit different since Broadwell got
several additional features since we added it in cpu_map.xml:
abm, arat, f16c, rdrand, vme, xsaveopt
Adding them only to the -IBRS variant would confuse our CPU detection
code.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Hrdina <phrdina@redhat.com>
This is a variant of Broadwell-noTSX with indirect branch prediction
protection. The only difference between Broadwell-noTSX and
Broadwell-noTSX-IBRS is the added "spec-ctrl" feature.
The Broadwell-noTSX-IBRS model in QEMU is a bit different since
Broadwell-noTSX got several additional features since we added it in
cpu_map.xml:
abm, arat, f16c, rdrand, vme, xsaveopt
Adding them only to the -IBRS variant would confuse our CPU detection
code.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Hrdina <phrdina@redhat.com>
This is a variant of Haswell with indirect branch prediction protection.
The only difference between Haswell and Haswell-IBRS is the added
"spec-ctrl" feature.
The Haswell-IBRS model in QEMU is a bit different since Haswell got
several additional features since we added it in cpu_map.xml:
arat, abm, f16c, rdrand, vme, xsaveopt
Adding them only to the -IBRS variant would confuse our CPU detection
code.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Hrdina <phrdina@redhat.com>
This is a variant of Haswell-noTSX with indirect branch prediction
protection. The only difference between Haswell-noTSX and
Haswell-noTSX-IBRS is the added "spec-ctrl" feature.
The Haswell-noTSX-IBRS model in QEMU is a bit different since
Haswell-noTSX got several additional features since we added it in
cpu_map.xml:
arat, abm, f16c, rdrand, vme, xsaveopt
Adding them only to the -IBRS variant would confuse our CPU detection
code.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Hrdina <phrdina@redhat.com>
This is a variant of IvyBridge with indirect branch prediction
protection. The only difference between IvyBridge and IvyBridge-IBRS is
the added "spec-ctrl" feature.
The IvyBridge-IBRS model in QEMU is a bit different since IvyBridge got
several additional features since we added it in cpu_map.xml:
arat, vme, xsaveopt
Adding them only to the -IBRS variant would confuse our CPU detection
code.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Hrdina <phrdina@redhat.com>
This is a variant of SandyBridge with indirect branch prediction
protection. The only difference between SandyBridge and SandyBridge-IBRS
is the added "spec-ctrl" feature.
The SandyBridge-IBRS model in QEMU is a bit different since SandyBridge
got several additional features since we added it in cpu_map.xml:
arat, vme, xsaveopt
Adding them only to the -IBRS variant would confuse our CPU detection
code.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Hrdina <phrdina@redhat.com>
This is a variant of Westmere with indirect branch prediction
protection. The only difference between Westmere and Westmere-IBRS is
the added "spec-ctrl" feature.
The Westmere-IBRS model in QEMU is a bit different since Westmere got
several additional features since we added it in cpu_map.xml:
arat, pclmuldq, vme
Adding them only to the -IBRS variant would confuse our CPU detection
code.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Hrdina <phrdina@redhat.com>
This is a variant of Nehalem with indirect branch prediction protection.
The only difference between Nehalem and Nehalem-IBRS is the added
"spec-ctrl" feature.
Thus the diff matches QEMU, but the new CPU model itself is different.
The QEMU's versions of both models contain "vme" feature, while this
feature is missing in libvirt's models. While we can't change the
existing Nehalem CPU model, we could add "vme" to Nehalem-IBRS to make
it similar to QEMU, but doing so would fool our CPU detecting code so
that any Nehalem CPU with "vme" feature would be detected as
Nehalem-IBRS CPU without spec-ctrl. Not adding "vme" to Nehalem-IBRS is
safe as QEMU will just provide the feature anyway, which matches what
happens with Nehalem (and new enough machine types).
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Hrdina <phrdina@redhat.com>
Added in QEMU commits TBD and TBD.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Hrdina <phrdina@redhat.com>
When specifying a new CPU model in cpu_map.xml as an extension to an
existing model, we forgot to copy the signature (family + model) from
the original CPU model.
We don't use this way of specifying CPU models, but it's still supported
and it becomes useful when someone wants to quickly hack up a CPU model
for testing or when creating additional variants of existing models to
help with fixing some spectral issues.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Hrdina <phrdina@redhat.com>
When translating CPUID data into CPU model + features, the code
sometimes uses an unexpected CPU model. There may be several reasons for
this, starting with wrong expectations and ending with an actual bug in
our code. These debug messages will help determining the reason.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Hrdina <phrdina@redhat.com>
A microcode update can cause the CPUID bits to change; an example
from the past was the update that disabled TSX on several Haswell and
Broadwell machines.
In order to track the x86 microcode version in the QEMU capabilities,
we have to fetch it and store it in the host CPU. This also makes the
version visible in "virsh capabilities", which is a nice side effect.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
The function will be used to initialize internal data of the x86 CPU
driver (including the CPU map).
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Right-aligning backslashes when defining macros or using complex
commands in Makefiles looks cute, but as soon as any changes is
required to the code you end up with either distractingly broken
alignment or unnecessarily big diffs where most of the changes
are just pushing all backslashes a few characters to one side.
Generated using
$ git grep -El '[[:blank:]][[:blank:]]\\$' | \
grep -E '*\.([chx]|am|mk)$$' | \
while read f; do \
sed -Ei 's/[[:blank:]]*[[:blank:]]\\$/ \\/g' "$f"; \
done
Signed-off-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna@redhat.com>
Linux kernel shows our "cmt" feature as "cqm". Let's mention the name in
the cpu_map.xml to make it easier to find.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: John Ferlan <jferlan@redhat.com>
Even though only family and model are used for matching CPUID data with
CPU models from cpu_map.xml, stepping is used by x86DataFilterTSX which
is supposed to disable TSX on CPU models with broken TSX support. Thus
we need to start parsing stepping from QEMU to make sure we don't
disable TSX on CPUs which provide working TSX implementation. See the
following patch for a real world example of such CPU.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: John Ferlan <jferlan@redhat.com>
When decoding CPUID data to virCPUDef we need to be careful about using
a CPU model which cannot be directly used on the current host. Normally,
libvirt would notice the features which prevent the model from being
usable and it would disable them in the computed virCPUDef, but this
won't work in case the definition of the CPU model in QEMU contains more
features than what we have in cpu_map.xml. We need to count with the
usability blockers we got from QEMU and explicitly disable all of them
to make the computed virCPUDef usable.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1464832
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: John Ferlan <jferlan@redhat.com>
This internal API can be used to find a specific CPU model in
virDomainCapsCPUModels list.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: John Ferlan <jferlan@redhat.com>
The "preferred" parameter is not used by any caller of cpuDecode
anymore. It's only used internally in cpu_x86 to implement cpuBaseline.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: John Ferlan <jferlan@redhat.com>
All APIs which expect a list of CPU models supported by hypervisors were
switched from char **models and int models to just accept a pointer to
virDomainCapsCPUModels object stored in domain capabilities. This avoids
the need to transform virDomainCapsCPUModelsPtr into a NULL-terminated
list of model names and also allows the various cpu driver APIs to
access additional details (such as its usability) about each CPU model.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: John Ferlan <jferlan@redhat.com>
libvirtd throws unhandled signal 11 on ppc while running
virsh cpu-compare with missing model tag in the xml. This
patch errors out in such situation.
Signed-off-by: Nitesh Konkar <nitkon12@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Available since QEMU 2.10.0 (specifically commit
v2.9.0-2233-g53f9a6f45f).
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Hrdina <phrdina@redhat.com>
The features were added to QEMU by commit v2.4.0-1690-gf7fda28094 as
Skylake Server features.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Hrdina <phrdina@redhat.com>
Only feature policy is checked on s390, which was previously done in
virCPUUpdate, but that's not the correct place for the check once we
have virCPUValidateFeatures.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
This new API may be used to check whether all features used in a CPU
definition are valid (e.g., libvirt knows their name, their policy is
supported, etc.). Leaving this API unimplemented in an arch subdriver
means libvirt does not restrict CPU features usable on the associated
architectures.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
The implementation of virConnectBaselineCPU may be different for each
hypervisor. Thus it shouldn't really be implmented in the cpu code.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Add a new CPU model called 'EPYC' to model processors from AMD EPYC
family (which includes EPYC 76xx,75xx,74xx, 73xx and 72xx).
The following features bits have been added/removed compare to Opteron_G5
Added: monitor, movbe, rdrand, mmxext, ffxsr, rdtscp, cr8legacy, osvw,
fsgsbase, bmi1, avx2, smep, bmi2, rdseed, adx, smap, clfshopt, sha
xsaveopt, xsavec, xgetbv1, arat
Removed: xop, fma4, tbm
The patch is depend on EPYC CPU model supported introduced in qemu [1]
[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9902205/
Cc: Tom Lendacky <Thomas.Lendacky@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Hrdina <phrdina@redhat.com>
CPU features unknown to a hypervisor will not be present in dataDisabled
even though the features won't naturally be enabled because.
Thus any features we asked for which are not in dataEnabled should be
considered disabled.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Use ATTRIBUTE_FALLTHROUGH, introduced by commit
5d84f5961b, instead of comments to
indicate that the fall through is an intentional behavior.
Signed-off-by: Marc Hartmayer <mhartmay@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Fiuczynski <fiuczy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Bjoern Walk <bwalk@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Sometimes we want to call virCPUGetHost only when it is implemented for
a given architecture to avoid logging expected and possibly misleading
errors. The new virCPUGetHostIsSupported API may be used to guard such
calls to virCPUGetHost.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Because of the changes done in the previous commit, @host is already a
migratable CPU and there's no need to do any additional filtering.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Because of the changes done in the previous commit, @host is already a
migratable CPU and there's no need to do any additional filtering.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
This new internal API makes a copy of virCPUDef while removing all
features which would block migration. It uses cpu_map.xml as a database
of such features, which should only be used as a fallback when we cannot
get the data from a hypervisor. The main goal of this API is to decouple
this filtering from virCPUUpdate so that the hypervisor driver can
filter the features according to the hypervisor.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
The public API flags are handled by the cpuBaselineXML wrapper. The
internal cpuBaseline API only needs to know whether it is supposed to
drop non-migratable features.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
cpuBaseline is responsible for computing a baseline CPU while feature
expansion is done by virCPUExpandFeatures. The cpuBaselineXML wrapper
(used by hypervisor drivers to implement virConnectBaselineCPU API)
calls cpuBaseline followed by virCPUExpandFeatures if requested by
VIR_CONNECT_BASELINE_CPU_EXPAND_FEATURES flag.
The features in the three changed test files had to be sorted using
"sort -k 3" because virCPUExpandFeatures returns a sorted list of
features.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Having to use cpuBaseline with VIR_CONNECT_BASELINE_CPU_EXPAND_FEATURES
flag to expand CPU features is strange. Not to mention that cpuBaseline
can only expand host CPU definitions (i.e., it completely ignores
feature policies). The new virCPUExpandFeatures API is designed to work
with both host and guest CPU definitions.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
There is no "node driver" as there was before, drivers have to do
their own ACL checking anyway, so they all specify their functions and
nodeinfo is basically just extending conf/capablities. Hence moving
the code to src/conf/ is the right way to go.
Also that way we can de-duplicate some code that is in virsysfs and/or
virhostcpu that got duplicated during the virhostcpu.c split. And
Some cleanup is done throughout the changes, like adding the vir*
prefix etc.
Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com>
Both QEMU and bhyve are using the same function for setting up the CPU
in virCapabilities, so de-duplicate it, save code and time, and help
other drivers adopt it.
Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com>
When starting a domain with custom guest CPU specification QEMU may add
or remove some CPU features. There are several reasons for this, e.g.,
QEMU/KVM does not support some requested features or the definition of
the requested CPU model in libvirt's cpu_map.xml differs from the one
QEMU is using. We can't really avoid this because CPU models are allowed
to change with machine types and libvirt doesn't know (and probably
doesn't even want to know) about such changes.
Thus when we want to make sure guest ABI doesn't change when a domain
gets migrated to another host, we need to update our live CPU definition
according to the CPU QEMU created. Once updated, we will change CPU
checking to VIR_CPU_CHECK_FULL to make sure the virtual CPU created
after migration exactly matches the one on the source.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822148https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824989
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
When creating host CPU definition usable with a given emulator, the CPU
should not be defined using an unsupported CPU model. The new @models
and @nmodels parameters can be used to limit CPU models which can be
used in the result.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
The parameter can be used to request either VIR_CPU_TYPE_HOST (which has
been assumed so far) or VIR_CPU_TYPE_GUEST definition.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
cpuNodeData has always been followed by cpuDecode as no hypervisor
driver is really interested in raw CPUID data for a host CPU. Let's
create a new CPU driver API which returns virCPUDefPtr directly.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
All Intel Haswell processors (except Xeon E7 v3 with stepping >= 4) have
TSX disabled by microcode update. As not all CPUs are guaranteed to be
patched with microcode updates we need to explicitly disable TSX on
affected CPUs to avoid its accidental usage.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1406791
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
The API is useful for creating virCPUData in a hypervisor driver from
data we got by querying the hypervisor.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
The API is useful for creating virCPUData in a hypervisor driver from
data we got by querying the hypervisor.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
The API is useful for creating virCPUData in a hypervisor driver from
data we got by querying the hypervisor.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
The CPU driver provides APIs to create and free virCPUDataPtr. Thus all
APIs exported from the driver should work with that rather than
requiring the caller to pass a pointer to an internal part of the
structure.
In other words
virCPUx86DataAddCPUID(cpudata, &cpuid)
is much better than the original
virCPUx86DataAddCPUID(&cpudata->data.x86, &cpuid)
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
The new API is called virCPUDataFree. Individual CPU drivers are no
longer required to implement their own freeing function unless they need
to free architecture specific data from virCPUData.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
virCPUDef.arch is not required to be filled in for guest CPU
definitions. It doesn't make sense to artificially mandate it to be set
when cpuDecode is called especially when virCPUData.arch passed to
cpuDecode already contains the architecture.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Strings associated with virDomainHyperv values in domain_conf.c are used to
construct HyperV CPU features names to be compared with names defined in
cpu_x86_data.h and the names for HyperV "spinlocks" feature don't match.
This leads to a misleading warning:
"host doesn't support hyperv 'spinlocks' feature" even when it's supported.
Let's fix it and rename along with it VIR_CPU_x86_KVM_HV_SPINLOCK to
VIR_CPU_x86_KVM_HV_SPINLOCKS.
Signed-off-by: Maxim Nestratov <mnestratov@virtuozzo.com>
virCPUDefStealModel is called with keepVendor == true which means the
cpu structure will keep its original vendor/vendor_id values. Thus it
makes no sense to copy them to the translated definition as they won't
be used there anyway. Except that the translated->vendor pointer might
get lost in x86Decode.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
On s390, the host's features are heavily influenced by not only the host
hardware but also by hardware microcode level, host OS version, qemu
version and kvm version. In this environment it does not make sense to
attempt to report exact host details.
Signed-off-by: Jason J. Herne <jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Implement compare for s390. Required to test the guest against the host for
guest cpu model runnability checking. We always return IDENTICAL to bypass
Libvirt's checking. s390 will rely on Qemu to perform the runnability checking.
Implement update for s390. required to support use of cpu "host-model" mode.
Signed-off-by: Jason J. Herne <jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
These features are included:
AVX512DQ, AVX512IFMA, AVX512BW, AVX512VL, AVX512VBMI, AVX512_4VNNIW and
AVX512_4FMAPS.
qemu commits: cc728d14 and 95ea69fb
Signed-off-by: Lin Ma <lma@suse.com>
We can't change feature names for compatibility reasons even if they
contain typos or other software uses different names for the same
features. By adding alternative spellings in our CPU map we at least
allow anyone to grep for them and find the correct libvirt's name.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
We have couple of functions that operate over NULL terminated
lits of strings. However, our naming sucks:
virStringJoin
virStringFreeList
virStringFreeListCount
virStringArrayHasString
virStringGetFirstWithPrefix
We can do better:
virStringListJoin
virStringListFree
virStringListFreeCount
virStringListHasString
virStringListGetFirstWithPrefix
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Guest CPU definitions with mode='custom' and missing <vendor> are
expected to run on a host CPU from any vendor as long as the required
CPU model can be used as a guest CPU on the host. But even though no CPU
vendor was explicitly requested we would sometimes force it due to a bug
in virCPUUpdate and virCPUTranslate.
The bug would effectively forbid cross vendor migrations even if they
were previously working just fine.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
PPC driver needs to convert POWERx_v* legacy CPU model names into POWERx
to maintain backward compatibility with existing domains. This patch
adds a new step into the guest CPU configuration work flow which CPU
drivers can use to convert legacy CPU definitions.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Both cpuCompare* APIs are renamed to virCPUCompare*. And they should now
work for any guest CPU definition, i.e., even for host-passthrough
(trivial) and host-model CPUs. The implementation in x86 driver is
enhanced to provide a hint about -noTSX Broadwell and Haswell models
when appropriate.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
The function is similar to virCPUDataCheckFeature, but it works directly
on CPU definition rather than requiring it to be transformed into CPU
data first.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
The API is supposed to make sure the provided CPU definition does not
use a CPU model which is not supported by the hypervisor (if at all
possible, of course).
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Keeping nfeatures_max set to 0 while nfeatures > 0 and some features are
already stored in features array is just asking for problems once we
want to add a new feature into the array.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
The reworked API is now called virCPUUpdate and it should change the
provided CPU definition into a one which can be consumed by the QEMU
command line builder:
- host-passthrough remains unchanged
- host-model is turned into custom CPU with a model and features
copied from host
- custom CPU with minimum match is converted similarly to host-model
- optional features are updated according to host's CPU
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
x86ModelFromCPU is used to provide CPUID data for features matching
@policy. This patch allows callers to set @policy to -1 to get combined
CPUID for all CPU features (including those implicitly provided a CPU
model) specified in CPU def.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
The ARM CPU driver wrongly reported host CPU model as "host", which made
host-model to be just an alias for host-passthrough. Let's drop this
insanity.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Some CPU drivers (such as arm) do not provide list of CPUs libvirt
supports and just pass any CPU model from domain XML directly to QEMU.
Such driver need to return models == NULL and success from cpuGetModels.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Our internal APIs mostly use virArch rather than strings. Switching
cpuGetModels to virArch will save us from unnecessary conversions in the
future.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
When starting a guest and copying host vendor cpuid to the guest
cpu, libvirtd would crash if the host cpu contained a NULL vendor
field. Avoid the crash by checking for a valid vendor in the host
cpu before copying the cpuid to the guest cpu.
For completeness, here is a backtrace from the crash
(gdb) bt
f0 0x00007ffff739bf33 in x86DataCpuid (cpuid=0x8, cpuid=0x8,
data=data@entry=0x7fffb800ee78) at cpu/cpu_x86.c:287
f1 virCPUx86DataAddCPUID (data=data@entry=0x7fffb800ee78, cpuid=0x8)
at cpu/cpu_x86.c:355
f2 0x00007ffff739ef47 in x86Compute (host=<optimized out>, cpu=0x7fffb8000cc0,
guest=0x7fffecca7348, message=<optimized out>) at cpu/cpu_x86.c:1580
f3 0x00007fffd2b38e53 in qemuBuildCpuModelArgStr (migrating=false,
hasHwVirt=<synthetic pointer>, qemuCaps=0x7fffb8001040, buf=0x7fffecca7360,
def=0x7fffc400ce20, driver=0x1c) at qemu/qemu_command.c:6283
f4 qemuBuildCpuCommandLine (cmd=cmd@entry=0x7fffb8002f60,
driver=driver@entry=0x7fffc80882c0, def=def@entry=0x7fffc400ce20,
qemuCaps=qemuCaps@entry=0x7fffb8001040, migrating=<optimized out>)
at qemu/qemu_command.c:6445
(gdb) f2
(gdb) p *host_model
$23 = {name = 0x7fffb800ec50 "qemu64", vendor = 0x0, signature = 0, data = {
len = 2, data = 0x7fffb800e720}}
Since the introduction of CMT features (commit v1.3.5-461-gf294b83)
starting a domain with host-model CPU on a host which supports CMT fails
because QEMU complains about unknown 'cmt' feature:
qemu-system-x86_64: CPU feature cmt not found
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1355857
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
By removing a non-migratable feature in a for loop we would fail to drop
every second non-migratable feature if the features array contained
several of them in a row.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Pretending (partial) support for something we don't understand is risky.
Reporting a failure is much better.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Some Intel processor families (e.g. the Intel Xeon processor E5 v3
family) introduced some PQos (Platform Qos) features, including CMT
(Cache Monitoring technology) and MBM (Memory Bandwidth Monitoring),
to monitor or control shared resource. This patch add them into x86
part of cpu_map.xml to be used for applications based on libvirt to
get cpu capabilities. For example, Nova in OpenStack schedules guests
based on the CPU features that the host has.
Signed-off-by: Qiaowei Ren <qiaowei.ren@intel.com>
Both ARM and AArch64 drivers are exactly the same (modulo function
names). Let's use just one driver for all ARM architectures.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Our current detection code uses just the number of CPU features which
need to be added/removed from the CPU model to fully describe the CPUID
data. The smallest number wins. But this may sometimes generate wrong
results as one can see from the fixed test cases. This patch modifies
the algorithm to prefer the CPU model with matching signature even if
this model results in a longer list of additional features.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
The CPU model was implemented in QEMU by commit f6f949e929.
The change to i7-5600U is wrong since it's a 5th generation CPU, i.e.,
Broadwell rather than Skylake, but that's just the result of our CPU
detection code (which is fixed by the following commit).
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
As a side effect this changes the order of CPU features in XMLs
generated by libvirt, but that's not a big deal since the order there is
insignificant.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
For two reasons:
- 0x00000001 is very similar to 0x80000001, but 0x01 is visually
different
- 0x01 format is consistent with CPUID manual
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
CPUID instruction normally takes its parameter from EAX, but sometimes
ECX is used as an additional parameter. This patch prepares the x86 CPU
driver code for the new 'ecx_in' CPUID parameter.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
The internal features are only used in explicit checks with
cpuHasFeature. Loading them into the CPU map is dangerous since the
features may accidentally be reported to users when decoding CPUID data.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
virCPUData and struct ppc64_model structures contained a pointer to
virCPUppc64Data, which was not very nice since the real data were
accessible by yet another level of pointers from virCPUppc64Data.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
virCPUData, virCPUx86Feature, and virCPUx86Model all contained a pointer
to virCPUx86Data, which was not very nice since the real CPUID data were
accessible by yet another pointer from virCPUx86Data. Moreover, using
virCPUx86Data directly will make static definitions of internal CPU
features a bit easier.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
CPUID instruction normally takes its parameter from EAX, but sometimes
ECX is used as an additional parameter. Let's rename 'function' to
'eax_in' in preparation for adding 'ecx_in'.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
A CPU data XML file already contains the architecture, let the parser
use it to detect which CPU driver should be used to parse the rest of
the file.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
When computing CPU data for a given guest CPU we should set CPUID vendor
bits appropriately so that we don't lose the vendor when transforming
CPU data back to XML description.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
cpu/cpu_ppc64.c: In function 'ppc64Compute':
cpu/cpu_ppc64.c:620:27: error: potential null pointer dereference [-Werror=null-dereference]
if (STRNEQ(guest_model->name, host_model->name)) {
~~~~~~~~~~~^~~
cpu/cpu_ppc64.c:620:9: note: in expansion of macro 'STRNEQ'
if (STRNEQ(guest_model->name, host_model->name)) {
^~~~~~
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
All callers of cpuGetModels expect @models to be NULL-terminated. Once
both x86GetModels and ppc64GetModels were fixed to meet this
expectation, we can explicitly document it.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
The architecture specific loaders are now called with a list of all
elements of a given type (rather than a single element at a time). This
avoids the need to reallocate the arrays in CPU maps for each element.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
There's no reason for keeping the models in a linked list. Especially
when we know upfront the total number of models we are loading.
As a nice side effect, this fixes ppc64GetModels to always return a
NULL-terminated list of models.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
There's no reason for keeping the vendors in a linked list. Especially
when we know upfront the total number of models we are loading.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
There's no reason for keeping the features in a linked list. Especially
when we know upfront the total number of features we are loading.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
There's no reason for keeping the vendors in a linked list. Especially
when we know upfront the total number of models we are loading.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
There's no reason for keeping the models in a linked list. Especially
when we know upfront the total number of models we are loading.
As a nice side effect, this fixes x86GetModels to always return a
NULL-terminated list of models.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
When searching for the best CPU model for CPUID data we can easily
ignore models with non-matching vendor before spending time on CPUID
data to virCPUDef conversion.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Splitting the comparison into a separate function makes the code cleaner
and easier to update in the future.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Usage of this keyword in front of function declaration that is exported via a
header file is unnecessary, since internally, this has been the default for most
compilers for quite some time.
Signed-off-by: Erik Skultety <eskultet@redhat.com>
Commit 7068b56c introduced several hyperv features. Not all hyperv
features are supported by old enough kernels and we shouldn't allow to
start a guest if kernel doesn't support any of the hyperv feature.
There is one exception, for backward compatibility we cannot error out
if one of the RELAXED, VAPIC or SPINLOCKS isn't supported, for the same
reason we ignore invtsc, to not break restoring saved domains with older
libvirt.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Hrdina <phrdina@redhat.com>
While the check is appropriate for eg. the x86 and generic drivers,
there are some valid ppc64 guest configurations where the CPU
model is supposed to be NULL.
Moving this check from the generic code to the drivers makes it
possible to accomodate both use cases.
Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251927
Not all combinations of host CPU models and compatibility modes
are valid, so we need to make sure we don't try to do something
that QEMU will reject.
Moreover, we need to apply a different logic to guests using
host-model and host-passthrough modes when testing them for host
compatibility.
Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251927
If a guest CPU is defined using
<cpu mode='host-model'/>
the <model> sub-element will contain the compatibility mode to use.
That means we can't just copy the host CPU model on cpuUpdate(),
otherwise we'll overwrite that information and migration of such
guests will fail.
Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251927
Unlike what happens on x86, on ppc64 you can't mix and match CPU
features to obtain the guest CPU you want regardless of the host
CPU, so the concept of model fallback doesn't apply.
Make sure CPU definitions emitted by the driver, eg. as output of
the cpuBaseline() and cpuUpdate() calls, reflect this fact.
All previously recognized CPU models (POWER7_v2.1, POWER7_v2.3,
POWER7+_v2.1 and POWER8_v1.0) are internally converted to the
corrisponding generation name so that existing guests don't stop
working.
Use multiple PVRs per CPU model to reduce the number of models we
need to keep track of.
Remove specific CPU models (eg. POWER7+_v2.1): the corresponding
generic CPU model (eg. POWER7) should be used instead to ensure
the guest can be booted on any compatible host.
Get rid of all the entries that did not match any of the CPU
models supported by QEMU, like power8 and power8e.
Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250977
This will allow us to perform PVR matching more broadly, eg. consider
both POWER8 and POWER8E CPUs to be the same even though they have
different PVR values.
This ensures comparison of two CPU definitions will be consistent
regardless of the fact that it is performed using cpuCompare() or
cpuGuestData(). The x86 driver uses the same exact code.
Limitations of the POWER architecture mean that you can't run
eg. a POWER7 guest on a POWER8 host when using KVM. This applies
to all guests, not just those using VIR_CPU_MATCH_STRICT in the
CPU definition; in fact, exact and strict CPU matching are
basically the same on ppc64.
This means, of course, that hosts using different CPUs have to be
considered incompatible as well.
Change ppc64Compute(), called by cpuGuestData(), to reflect this
fact and update test cases accordingly.
Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250977
ppc64Compute(), called by cpuNodeData(), is used not only to retrieve
the driver-specific data associated to a guest CPU definition, but
also to check whether said guest CPU is compatible with the host CPU.
If the user is not interested in the CPU data, it's perfectly fine
to pass a NULL pointer instead of a return location, and the
compatibility data returned should not be affected by this. One of
the checks, specifically the one on CPU model name, was however
only performed if the return location was non-NULL.
Use briefer checks, eg. (!model) instead of (model == NULL), and
avoid initializing to NULL a pointer that would be assigned in
the first line of the function anyway.
Also remove a pointless NULL assignment.
No functional changes.
Use the ppc64Driver prefix for all functions that are used to
fill in the cpuDriverPPC64 structure, ie. those that are going
to be called by the generic CPU code.
This makes it clear which functions are exported and which are
implementation details; it also gets rid of the ambiguity that
affected the ppc64DataFree() function which, despite what the
name suggested, was not related to ppc64DataCopy() and could
not be used to release the memory allocated for a
virCPUppc64Data* instance.
No functional changes.
Only the symbols exported by the driver have been updated;
the driver implementation itself still uses the old names
internally.
No functional changes.
The driver only supports VIR_ARCH_PPC64 and VIR_ARCH_PPC64LE.
Just shuffling files around and updating the build system
accordingly. No functional changes.
Inheritance among CPU model is cool but it makes reviewing CPU model
definitions and comparing them to CPU models from QEMU rather hard and
unpleasant. Let's define all CPU models from scratch.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Inheritance among CPU model is cool but it makes reviewing CPU model
definitions and comparing them to CPU models from QEMU rather hard and
unpleasant. Let's define all CPU models from scratch.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Inheritance among CPU model is cool but it makes reviewing CPU model
definitions and comparing them to CPU models from QEMU rather hard and
unpleasant. Let's define all CPU models from scratch.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Inheritance among CPU model is cool but it makes reviewing CPU model
definitions and comparing them to CPU models from QEMU rather hard and
unpleasant. Let's define all CPU models from scratch.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Inheritance among CPU model is cool but it makes reviewing CPU model
definitions and comparing them to CPU models from QEMU rather hard and
unpleasant. Let's define all CPU models from scratch.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Inheritance among CPU model is cool but it makes reviewing CPU model
definitions and comparing them to CPU models from QEMU rather hard and
unpleasant. Let's define all CPU models from scratch.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Inheritance among CPU model is cool but it makes reviewing CPU model
definitions and comparing them to CPU models from QEMU rather hard and
unpleasant. Let's define all CPU models from scratch.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Inheritance among CPU model is cool but it makes reviewing CPU model
definitions and comparing them to CPU models from QEMU rather hard and
unpleasant. Let's define all CPU models from scratch.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Inheritance among CPU model is cool but it makes reviewing CPU model
definitions and comparing them to CPU models from QEMU rather hard and
unpleasant. Let's define all CPU models from scratch.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Inheritance among CPU model is cool but it makes reviewing CPU model
definitions and comparing them to CPU models from QEMU rather hard and
unpleasant. Let's define all CPU models from scratch.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Inheritance among CPU model is cool but it makes reviewing CPU model
definitions and comparing them to CPU models from QEMU rather hard and
unpleasant. Let's define all CPU models from scratch.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Inheritance among CPU model is cool but it makes reviewing CPU model
definitions and comparing them to CPU models from QEMU rather hard and
unpleasant. Let's define all CPU models from scratch.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Inheritance among CPU model is cool but it makes reviewing CPU model
definitions and comparing them to CPU models from QEMU rather hard and
unpleasant. Let's define all CPU models from scratch.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Inheritance among CPU model is cool but it makes reviewing CPU model
definitions and comparing them to CPU models from QEMU rather hard and
unpleasant. Let's define all CPU models from scratch.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
